In the comparison of data centers, what is a likely outcome for Jack's company that uses virtualized servers versus Mack's company?

The outcome for Jack's company that uses virtualized servers is that they pay for fewer software licenses. This is because virtualization allows multiple virtual servers to operate on a single physical server. As a result, companies can consolidate their server environment, which often leads to a reduction in the number of individual software licenses required. Many software vendors offer licensing options that are more favorable for virtualized environments, enabling companies to significantly decrease their software costs.

In contrast, the other options do not accurately reflect the benefits of virtualization. For instance, while it's possible that Mack’s company could have lower energy costs due to fewer physical servers, virtualized setups typically reduce energy consumption since they need less physical hardware overall. The idea that Jack’s company would need to employ more people is counterintuitive, as virtualization often requires fewer staff to manage resources efficiently. Lastly, while Mack's company may lower some costs, the statement regarding spending less on hardware is not necessarily dependent on the virtualization status; both companies could have differing strategies that influence hardware expenditure.